jev-resume-screening
screens one resume against a JD in a single request of five Noul evidence gates, four Score dimensions, and one background-routing Choice, with criteria hardened v1→v3 against negative-control resumes (a glossy-trap CV's self-described "AI heavy user" fell 0.95→0.49) and any low-confidence answer escalated to human review.
무엇을 판단하는가
CHOICE
Picks one option from a fixed set
SCORE
Rates against ordered levels
NOUL
Answers a yes / no question
Inferred from this project's own one-line summary in the community list — it reads as a SCORE + NOUL decision. Read the source to confirm.
SCORE 호출은 이렇게 생겼다
이 질문 유형의 일반적인 뼈대이지 이 프로젝트의 실제 코드가 아니다.
from typesafe import TypeSafe
ts = TypeSafe()
result = ts.evaluate(
state=candidate,
questions={
"relevance": {
"type": "score",
"levels": ["low", "medium", "high"],
"instructions": "How relevant is this to the query?",
}
},
)
if result["relevance"] >= 0.7:
keep(candidate)점수와 순위 프로젝트 더 보기
Clean Code Judgescores every file of a pull request on 31 boolean Clean Code smells plus function size and nesting, then hands the verdicts to a writing model for the review prose.citation-verifierchecks whether each cited paper actually supports the sentence citing it, with Claude locating the quote, Jev scoring the support, and a human making the final call.jev-assistranks every tracked file by relevance to a one-line task description — Jev asks each file the same typed question in parallel batches, so an agent in a 600-file repo starts from the handful it actually needs — with a validate command that grades the ranking against past commits.jev-bfsfinds link paths between English Wikipedia articles by having Jev rank each page's outgoing links while Python controls the search.